Why Another Update?
Once confined to glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have firmly entrenched themselves as foundational agents in the treatment of heart failure and chronic kidney disease, regardless of diabetic status. This rapid evolution of scope has sparked a near-annual need for updates. The 2024–2025 cycle, however, has delivered more than just incremental gains; it has produced transformative insights that shift the clinical framing of this class altogether.
In the past twelve months, large-scale meta-analyses and long-term follow-ups have extended the evidence base into acute myocardial infarction (MI), acute heart failure, and non-diabetic renal populations. Novel mechanistic discoveries suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors exert senotherapeutic effects, targeting cellular aging and oxidative stress pathways. Meanwhile, the clinical pipeline has matured to include sotagliflozin, a dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor, with cardiovascular outcomes superior to some of its predecessors.
Beyond efficacy, questions around arrhythmia risk, volume status, and guideline harmonization have been re-evaluated in the light of updated regulatory guidance. Notably, the ADA and ESC 2025 recommendations now position SGLT2 inhibitors even earlier in cardio–renal–metabolic algorithms, regardless of glucose control status.
This article provides a curated review of the most impactful research from mid-2024 through mid-2025. Drawing on recent publications across NEJM, Lancet, European Heart Journal, Frontiers, and Nature journals, we’ll examine where the field stands, what’s emerging, and how these findings are reshaping frontline clinical decision-making.
Cardiovascular Breakthroughs
In 2024–2025, SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated expanded cardiovascular benefits beyond chronic care, now showing promise in acute and high-risk settings like myocardial infarction (MI), acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
A 2025 meta-analysis in European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy pooled over 11,000 post-MI patients and found a 14% reduction in all-cause mortality, along with improved left ventricular function by 12 weeks. The best effects appeared in those with diabetes or elevated NT-proBNP, supporting early post-MI use alongside standard therapies like ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. Importantly, safety remained favorable with no excess arrhythmia or renal events.
In ADHF, pooled results from four phase III trials (Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2025) involving 9,300 patients showed SGLT2 inhibitors reduced HF worsening or cardiovascular death by 20% within 90 days. Symptom relief was evident as early as day 5, and benefits extended to both HFrEF and HFpEF, reflecting mechanisms like natriuresis and endothelial stabilization.
Renal Advances
Renal protection remains a standout benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors. New long-term data from DAPA-CKD and EMPA-KIDNEY confirm durable effects, including in advanced CKD and non-diabetic cases.
-
DAPA-CKD Extension
A 5-year follow-up of over 4,000 patients (published in NDT, 2024) showed dapagliflozin preserved eGFR at a steady ~1.5 mL/min/1.73m²/year over placebo, even in stage 4 CKD. The number needed to treat to delay dialysis or creatinine doubling stayed under 2
-
EMPA-KIDNEY Follow-Up
Published in NEJM (2024), this study extended SGLT2i benefits to patients without albuminuria and those with non-diabetic CKD. A 28% risk reduction in kidney outcomes suggests efficacy beyond proteinuria.
-
Clinical Implications
Evidence now supports earlier SGLT2i use even without proteinuria. Still, caution is advised in patients near dialysis or with fluid balance concerns.
Mechanistic Discoveries
Over the past year, SGLT2 inhibitors have expanded their cardiovascular impact well beyond chronic disease management. New evidence suggests benefit in acute and high-risk settings, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and increasingly heterogeneous forms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Post-MI Use: A Signal for Early Intervention
A 2025 meta-analysis pooled data from five randomized controlled trials involving over 11,000 patients with recent AMI, assessing the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular remodeling, recurrent events, and mortality. Results showed a 14% relative reduction in all-cause mortality and significant improvement in left ventricular function by 12 weeks post-MI. The effect was most pronounced in patients with concomitant diabetes or high baseline NT-proBNP levels.
These findings support the inclusion of SGLT2 inhibitors in early post-MI pharmacotherapy bundles, particularly where ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers are already standard. The safety signal remained favorable, with no increase in arrhythmia, hypotension, or renal adverse events in this population.
Acute Heart Failure: Rapid and Durable Effects
In acute settings, new pooled data from four phase III trials, summarized in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (2025), highlighted the utility of SGLT2 inhibitors started during or immediately after hospitalization for ADHF. Among 9,300 participants, initiation of dapagliflozin or empagliflozin reduced the composite endpoint of worsening HF or CV death by 20% within 90 days, with symptom improvement seen as early as day 5 of therapy. These benefits were observed in both HFrEF and HFpEF phenotypes, further underscoring the class’s pleiotropic mechanisms.
HFpEF Extensions: A New Paradigm
Expanding on prior EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER trial results, recent subgroup analyses and real-world registry data suggest that patients with HFpEF and mildly reduced EF (40–49%) may derive comparable benefits to those with overt HFrEF. More strikingly, benefit appears consistent across diverse phenotypes: elderly women, those with obesity-related HFpEF, and patients with preserved renal function but diastolic dysfunction.
New Molecules & Class Expansion
This year marked a turning point in the evolution of SGLT2 inhibitors from a uniform class to a diversified therapeutic platform. Chief among the advances was the clinical maturation of sotagliflozin, a dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superior cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients. Unlike earlier agents that act solely in the kidney, sotagliflozin also inhibits SGLT1 in the intestinal mucosa, blunting postprandial glucose absorption and potentially reducing gut-driven inflammation. In a major cardiovascular outcome trial published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (2025), sotagliflozin reduced the composite risk of heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death by nearly 30% in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent hospitalization for heart failure.
This dual mechanism has reopened questions around class uniformity. While core renal effects remain consistent across SGLT2 inhibitors, the emerging differences in receptor profiles, absorption sites, and inflammatory modulation suggest that future molecules may target distinct clinical phenotypes. Precision pharmacology is already in motion, with trials exploring agents that blend SGLT2 inhibition with sodium–hydrogen exchange blockade, or tailor efficacy to specific genotypes.
These developments signal that the SGLT2 era is broadening, bringing new molecular variants with disease-specific potential.
Safety & Arrhythmia Outcomes
As SGLT2 inhibitors move into broader, often frailer patient populations including those with acute heart failure and advanced CKD their safety profile has come under renewed scrutiny. One of the most discussed concerns in 2024–2025 has been arrhythmia risk, particularly in those with structural heart disease or electrolyte disturbances.
A large-scale pharmacoepidemiologic analysis published in early 2025 addressed this directly. Drawing on over 30,000 patients from real-world registries, the study found no increased risk of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias in users of SGLT2 inhibitors compared to matched controls. In fact, the data suggested a mild protective effect, particularly for atrial fibrillation, likely mediated by improved volume status, reduced left atrial pressure, and systemic anti-inflammatory effects.
Beyond rhythm concerns, the usual suspects (euglycemic ketoacidosis, volume depletion, and mycotic genital infections) remained rare and manageable. Updated meta-analyses show no significant rise in serious adverse events, even in patients over 75 or those initiating therapy during hospital admission. However, caution is still warranted in those with poor oral intake, concurrent diuretic use, or severe hypotension.
Guidelines & Regulatory Shifts
In 2025, SGLT2 inhibitors were formally reclassified as organ-protective therapies, not just glucose-lowering agents. The ADA now recommends them for all patients with CKD, HF, or ASCVD risk, regardless of diabetes. The ESC includes them in acute heart failure protocols, expanding use into HFpEF and mildly reduced EF. Regulatory agencies followed suit, approving label expansions for both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin. Despite this, adoption in primary care lags, limited by outdated perceptions. With updated guidelines and b outcomes data, the next step is translating these endorsements into routine, multidisciplinary practice.
Ongoing Trials & Future Directions
With foundational benefits now well established, current research is pushing SGLT2 inhibitors into new therapeutic terrain. Ongoing trials are exploring their impact on cognitive decline, atrial fibrillation, and resistant hypertension, particularly in combination with other cardiometabolic agents. Several studies are testing early inpatient initiation protocols, especially post-MI and in acute kidney injury, to determine whether prompt use improves recovery and long-term organ function.
Precision medicine is also gaining ground. As reviewed in npj Metabolic Health & Disease, efforts are underway to develop predictive biomarkers and AI-guided titration tools that personalize dosing and identify likely responders.
Meanwhile, drug development continues to diversify, with SGLT1/2 dual agents, gut-targeted inhibitors, and transporter-selective compounds entering phase II trials. By 2026, we may see trials that remove glycosuria entirely, preserving organ benefits while minimizing urinary adverse effects.
SGLT2 inhibitors have become a platform rather than a class. Their future will likely involve synergy with GLP-1 receptor agonists, machine-learning-based prescribing, and perhaps indications far beyond cardiometabolic disease.
References
https://academic.oup.com/ehjcvp/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf026/8120406
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1543153/epub
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2409183
https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/39/12/2040/7668437
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41514-025-00227-y
https://nypost.com/2025/02/15/health/first-of-its-kind-drug-can-reduce-heart-attacks-and-strokes/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39893467/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s44324-025-00068-z